Notta Review: Fast, Multilingual, and Built for Mobile

Notta approaches AI meeting notes from a different angle than the North America–centric tools. Its strengths are speed, language coverage and a genuinely good mobile app — which makes it a natural pick if your work crosses languages or happens away from a desk.

What stands out

Multilingual transcription and translation. This is Notta's headline feature. It transcribes a wide range of languages and can translate on the fly, which is valuable for international teams and anyone taking notes in a second language.

Real mobile support. Most competitors treat mobile as an afterthought. Notta's app is capable enough to record and transcribe in-person conversations, not just video calls — handy for interviews, field notes and quick captures.

Fast turnaround. Transcripts come back quickly, and the editing interface is responsive. For high-volume note-takers, that speed adds up.

Where it is weaker

• Shorter attribution window. Notta's cookie/tracking window is on the shorter side compared with some rivals — relevant if you care about that, less so for everyday use.
• Team knowledge features are lighter. It is excellent at capturing and translating, but it is not trying to be the searchable team memory that Fireflies is.
• Summaries are solid, not spectacular. Good enough for recall; power users may still want to tune them.

Pricing

Notta offers a free tier plus paid plans that raise limits on minutes, export and advanced features. The free plan is a reasonable way to test whether the multilingual and mobile strengths matter for your workflow before paying.

Verdict

Best for multilingual teams and mobile-first note-takers. If your meetings happen in more than one language, or you frequently capture conversations on your phone, Notta is the most comfortable fit here. If you mainly need a searchable team knowledge base, look at Fireflies instead — see the full roundup for the side-by-side.

Features and pricing were accurate at the time of writing.